您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    2019年民事证据失权问题研究——以深圳法院的实践为例

    摘要

    证据失权即对当事人未按期提交的证据赋予不为法院质证的消极后果。目前中国民事司法实践中,法院往往选择性地赋予逾期证据失权的后果,导致证据失权制度未能有效地遏制诉讼拖延、证据突袭等不良诉讼现象。诚实信用原则与程序正义观念共同构成证据失权制度得以适用的正当性基础。当事人为故意或重大过失的主观归责形态、未按期举证及逾期证据不关乎案件基本事实这三项要件共同构成证据失权适用的前提。在证据失权的构成要件中引入诉讼迟延、强调法官的释明作用、统一证据交换适用的标准,是发挥证据失权制度功能的有效路径。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    Evidence loss of right is the negative consequence of failing to cross-examine the evidence submitted by the parties on time. At present,in the practice of civil justice in our country,due to the consequences of the court’s selective granting of overdue evidence’s disqualification,the system of civil evidence Loss of right has failed to effectively curb the bad litigation phenomena such as litigation delay and evidence raid. The principle of good faith and procedural justice concept constitute the basis for the application of the system of evidence loss of power. The three elements of subjective imputation form of intentional or gross negligence,failure to prove evidence on time and overdue evidence is not related to the basic facts of the case together constitute the premise of the application of the wrong right of evidence. It is an effective way to promote the system of evidential disqualification by introducing the elements of delay in litigation,emphasizing the interpretation function of judges and unifying the applicable standard of evidence exchange.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    郝晶晶:郝晶晶,深圳大学法学院助理教授,主要研究方向为民事诉讼法。
    唐诗丹:唐诗丹,深圳大学法学院硕士研究生,主要研究方向为民事诉讼法。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告