The copyright administrative penalty of the video network platform in this case involves not only the determination of copyright infringements，but also the identification of public interests，the legality of the subject of administrative enforcement for copyright and administrative enforcement procedures as well as the calculation of illegal proceeds. Since the concept of public interest is not clearly defined in law，rules and regulations，the court considered its policy attributes and made a judgment based on the extent of the infringer’s fault and the consequences of the damage. The subject of administrative enforcement for copyright and administrative enforcement procedures are the key to determining whether the administrative punishment decision is legal. Shenzhen Market Supervision Bureau had obtained the administrative powers through statutory means when the punishment decision was made，and it had fulfilled the complete procedures of administrative punishment according to law. The number of illegal proceeds is the basis for determining the amount of fine. In the case that it was impossible to directly ascertain the illegal profit and the actual operating amount，Shenzhen Market Supervision Bureau calculateed based on the market price of the film and television works involved. The affirmation of the calculation method by the court has significance reference value for this type of case.