2018年度,30家全国性学术类社会团体参与评估并获得评估等级,其中4A级9家,3A级17家,2A级4家。本报告基于全国性学术类社会团体评估结果及相关资料展开分析,从基础条件、内部治理、工作绩效和社会评价四个方面呈现参评全国性学术类社会团体的发展情况。研究发现,各家全国性学术类社会团体登记管理事项规范性较强,分支机构与总会联系紧密,学术活动开展活跃,信息公开做到形式与内容并重。与此同时,参评全国性学术类社会团体对党组织活动日益重视,财务管理制度逐步规范化,学术自律制度建设稳步推进、国际化程度不断加深。
<<In 2018,thirty national academic associations participated in Annual Social Organization Evaluation and obtained their grades,as nine being awarded 4A,seventeen for 3A and four for 2A. Based on the evaluation results and related materials,this report analyzes the fundamental conditions,internal governance,working performance and social assessment of the national academic associations,thus reflecting the development of these organizations. Findings suggest that academic associations have relatively normative registration items,strict branch agency management,vivid academic activities and developed information disclosure. Meanwhile,the evaluation participants display positive trends on party organization construction,financial management,academic self-discipline intervention and internationalization operation.
<<Keywords: | Information DisclosureRegistration ManagementNational Academic AssociationAcademic Activity |