梳理并比较了2000年以来京津冀三地涉及养老机构的相关政策,对部分大城市有亮点的政策进行了分析;比较分析了京津冀养老机构的发展状况、养老机构工作人员状况和重点城市与区域养老机构发展状况;分析了北京市养老机构的公建(办)民营发展状况,涉及养老机构运营中的参与主体的分工、养老机构运营的6种产权模式、公建(办)民营的4种实施模式、养老机构公建(办)民营运行效果;从供需两个视角考察了北京市养老机构的发展现状,并与上海、广州和重庆进行比较;重点梳理了自由主义福利国家模式(以英国为例)、法团主义福利国家模式(以德国为例)、社会民主主义福利国家模式(以芬兰为例)、东亚福利国家模式(以日本和韩国为例)的长期照护筹资制度与服务体系及其对中国长期照护筹资和服务体系建立的借鉴意义。
<<This paper analyze policy documents on elderly homes,compares the development status of elderly homes in Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei and find there are nine major contradictions in the coordination of elderly homes in Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei. This paper pays attention to the development of four cities’elderly homes from the perspective of supply and demand,and puts forward countermeasures for the high-quality development of Beijing’s elderly homes based on the analysis,explores the development status of Beijing’s elderly care institutions initiated by the government but operated by private entities. At last,this paper analyze fund-raising and service of long term care insurance in main developed countries.
<<Keywords: | Beijing-Tianjin-HebeiAging PolicyElderly HomesInitiated by the Government but Operated by Private Entities |