In recent years，the Suzhou Industrial Park Court has responded positively to the new demand for the settlement of diversified disputes in the process of urbanization in its jurisdiction. It has learned from the social governance experience of the Community Center in Singapore，inherited and developed the “Fengqiao Experience” and highlighted the role of grassroots courts in standardizing and guiding，promoting mechanisms and ensuring effectiveness in the construction of a multi-channeled dispute resolution mechanism. Through the three-dimensional reform and innovation of “resource integration + dispute diversion + platform construction + mechanism innovation”，a multi-channeled dispute resolution system featuring multi-subjects，multi-channels，multi-platforms and interdependence，mutual connection and mutual coordination has been formed. A “legal service circle” with the characteristics of the park has been created，and a park scheme with multi-channeled dispute resolution mechanisms has been formed. Based on the analysis of the problems existing in the practice of carrying out multi-channeled dispute resolution system in the industrial park courts，this paper puts forward opinions and suggestions for the construction of a systematic，normalized，standardized and substantial multi-channeled dispute resolution system from three aspects：strengthening the systematic construction of the mechanism，increasing investment in the mechanism，and deepening the diversion effect of the mechanism on litigation cases.