“枫桥经验”理论经过了时间的检验,具有其独特的指导实践的精神内核,“枫桥经验”理论与多元化纠纷化解机制具有契合点,体现在主体的多元化、纠纷化解的有效性和解纷机制的协同性。浙江省湖州地区在多元化纠纷化解机制运行中坚持和发展“枫桥经验”,积累了很多实践经验,也反映了解纷体系不完善、衔接不畅等问题。本文立足“枫桥经验”理论的本质,就进一步完善多元化纠纷化解机制提出了对策和建议。在解纷理念上,实现从“诉讼优先”向“诉讼断后”转变;在制度构建上,实现从“衔接不畅”向“协同治理”转变,建立“递进式”纠纷分层过滤机制;在立法层面上,实现从“一元论”向“二元论”转变。
<<The theory of “Fengqiao Experience” has passed the test of time and possess its unique spiritual core to guide practice. The theory and multi-channeled dispute resolution mechanism share something in common,which is reflected in the diversity of subjects,the effectiveness of dispute resolution and the synergy of dispute resolution mechanisms. Huzhou,Zhejiang Province,has accumulated a lot of practical experience in adhering to and developing the theory in the operation of the multi-channeled dispute resolution mechanism,which also reflects the problems of imperfect dispute resolution system and poor cohesion. Based on the essence of the “Fengqiao Experience” theory,this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to further improve the diversified multi-channeled dispute resolution. As for the concept of dispute resolution,the transformation from “litigation priority” to “litigation termination” is realized. In terms of system construction,the transformation from “poor connection” to “cooperative governance” is realized,and a “progressive” layered dispute filtering mechanism is established. On the legislative level,the transformation from “monism” to “dualism” is realized.
<<Keywords: | Fengqiao ExperienceMulti-channeled Dispute Resolution Mechanism“Progressive” Hierarchical Dispute Filtering System |