随着中国经济快速发展和社会结构不断转型升级,大量错综复杂的社会矛盾以诉讼的形式涌入法院。立案登记制的实施,带动诉讼案件数量大幅上升;法官员额制度的出台,让拥有审判资格的法官数量锐减,“一增一减”使得处于司法改革“阵痛期”的法院工作压力倍增。在既无法通过增加人员解决审判力量,又无法通过提高诉讼门槛降低案件数量的现实情况下,推行案件繁简分流改革是有效缓解当前法院“案多人少”压力的重要举措。本文通过梳理河南省濮阳市华龙区法院案件繁简分流举措,对比改革前后的审判质效变化趋势,深挖繁简分流工作中存在的问题,以期进一步探寻繁简分流的更优举措。
<<With the rapid development of China’s economy and the continuous transformation and upgrading of its social structure,courts have to handle a pool of litigation cases reflecting complicated social contradictions. The filing and registration system has greatly increased the number of litigation cases,while the quota system for judges has sharply reduced the number of judges who have the qualification for trial. Therefore,during the process of reform,courts are forced to face increasing pressures. As it is impossible to increase the number of judges or to reduce the number of cases by raising the litigation threshold,the reform of sorting between complex and simple legal cases is an important means to effectively relieve this pressure. This paper sorts out the measures taken by Hualong District people’s Court,Puyang City,Henan Province,compares trial quality and efficiency before and after the reform,and explores the problems existing in the work,in order to further explore better measures.
<<Keywords: | Resource AllocationJudicial ReformSorting between Complex and Simple Legal CasesJudicial Quality and Efficiency |