司法责任制改革过程中出现的“放权有余而控权不足”问题,使得院庭长对特定案件的监管显得尤为重要。但目前审判监督管理实践中还存在认识不统一、制度不健全、配套不到位等问题。因此,有必要在最高人民法院相关指导意见的基础上,对特定案件的类型进行细化,并从程序启动、识别主体、责任落实等方面完善相应的监管机制。
<<The problem of “surplus decentralization and insufficient control” in the process of reforming the judicial accountability system makes presiding judges’ supervision of specific cases especially important. However,at present,there are still some problems in the practice of trial supervision and management,such as inconsistent understanding,imperfect system and inadequate support. Therefore,it is necessary to refine types of specific cases on the basis of the relevant guidance of the Supreme Court,and to improve the corresponding supervision mechanism from the aspects of procedure initiation,identification of subjects and implementation of responsibilities.
<<Keywords: | Trial ManagementJudicial Accountability System“Four Types of Cases”Responsibilities of the Presiding Judges |