案例指导制度是中国特色社会主义司法制度的重要组成部分,随着案例指导制度的深入实施,案例在总结审判经验、指导审判实践、规范法官自由裁量、维护司法公正、宣传法制、促进立法等方面的作用日益显现。2019年初,河南省高级人民法院抽调省法院相关业务庭室和部分中级人民法院、基层法院的调研骨干力量组成撰写小组,对刑事案例编报工作中第三方支付方式下盗窃罪与诈骗罪的区分、刑事案件中电动三轮车属性认定、交通肇事逃逸情节对商业三者险赔付问题的影响、刑法上因果关系的认定的法律适用问题进行了概括总结,形成了刑事案例分析报告。后依托省法院与郑州大学联合成立的“中国司法案例研究中心”,召开了刑事案例分析研讨会,在充分听取专家学者建议的基础上对报告进行修订完善,并形成最终成果,并提出了进一步转变司法理念,持续强化人权保障意识、加强对“骗婚型”诈骗犯罪的防范和治理、加强对新型支付方式下侵财性犯罪案件的调研指导方面的建议。希望本报告在为河南省司法审判和理论研究提供参考的同时,能进一步提升河南省的案例工作指导水平。
<<Practice proves that the case guidance system is an important judicial reform measure that follows the law of judicial work,and the guiding case and judicial interpretation are two complementary channels to guide the trial work and safeguard judicial justice. At the beginning of 2019,the Henan Provincial High Court transferred the key research forces of the relevant business chambers of the provincial courts and some of the middle courts and grassroots courts to form a writing team. Based on the 2018case analysis reports reported by the various middle courts,a criminal case analysis report was formed. After relying on the “China Judicial Case Research Center” jointly established by the Provincial Court and Zhengzhou University,a criminal case analysis seminar was held,and the report was revised and improved on the basis of full listening to the suggestions of experts and scholars,and the final results were formed. It is hoped that this report can promote the improvement of case guidance in our province as a whole while providing reference for judicial trial and theoretical research.
<<