为了更好地把握北京居民的人际冷漠状况,本次调查从三个角度(认知、情境反应和利益关联行为)考察人际冷漠,并从社会和群体两个层面探索了预测人际冷漠的因素。社会层面的成因主要关注物质主义价值观,群体层面的成因则关注社区心理(包含社区认同和社区行为)。通过对来自北京16个城区的17~67岁的2042名居民进行问卷调查,结果显示:①总体上,北京居民的人际冷漠程度较低,具体体现在有较低的人际冷漠认知、较高的助人倾向。②不同性别、年龄和客观社会经济地位的群体,人际冷漠存在差异;具体来说,女性在认知上的人际冷漠倾向更低,但是在涉及金钱利益的助人行为上,男性表现出了更高的助人倾向;17~29岁群体的人际冷漠程度较高;在不同的人际冷漠指标上,客观社会经济地位展现了不同的影响,高社会经济地位的个体更可能通过捐款的方式帮助他人,但是在模糊的助人情境下,他们也展现了更高的冷漠倾向。③物质主义会增加人际冷漠,而社区认同和邻里互动可以降低人际冷漠、相比于社区认同,物质主义和邻里互动对人际冷漠有更强的预测作用。具体来说,人际冷漠认知更容易受到物质主义和邻里互动的影响;情境助人更容易受到社区认同和邻里互动的影响,邻里互动的预测作用更强;而利益关联的助人行为容易受到物质主义的负面影响。最后,从社会工作角度对如何干预物质主义并提高社区认同和邻里互动,进而降低人际冷漠、建设和谐社会提出了相关的建议。
<<In order to better understand the interpersonal apathy of Beijing residents,the current survey examined the interpersonal apathy from three perspectives(cognition,situational response and interest-related behavior),and explored the factors predicting interpersonal apathy from both social and group levels. On social-level,we focused on the materialistic values;and on the group-level,we concerned about the community-relevant variables(including community identity and community behavior). Through a questionnaire survey of 2042 Beijing residents,aged 17 to 67 from 16 urban districts in Beijing,the results show that:(1)In general,the degree of interpersonal apathy of Beijing residents was relatively low,which was reflected in the lower level of cognitive interpersonal apathy and a strong tendency of helping behavior. (2)Different group(such as different gender,age,objective socioeconomic status)had different extent of interpersonal apathy. Specifically,women had lower cognitive apathy,while men had stronger tendency of the helping behavior which was involved monetary benefits;the group aged 17 to 29 had higher interpersonal apathy;objective socioeconomic status exhibited distinct effects on different indicators of interpersonal apathy,individuals with high socioeconomic status were more likely to help others through donations while they were less willing to help others in a vague situation. (3)Materialism positively predicted interpersonal apathy,whereas community identity and neighborhood interaction negatively predicted interpersonal apathy. Compared with community identity,materialism and neighborhood interaction had a stronger predictive effect on interpersonal apathy. Specifically,cognitive interpersonal apathy was more susceptible to materialism and neighborhood interaction;helping behavior in a specific situation was more sensitive to community identity and neighborhood interaction,and the predictive role of neighborhood interaction was stronger than that of community identity;and interest-related helping behavior is more susceptible to materialism. According to above results,we put forward some constructive suggestions on how to intervene in materialism and improve community identity and neighborhood interaction,thereby reducing interpersonal apathy and building a harmonious society.
<<Keywords: | Community ParticipationMaterialismCommunity IdentityInterpersonal ApathyNeighborhood Interaction |