提高对教育质量的满意度是提高城市居民生活质量的重要组成部分,也是党的十九大要求。本文通过问卷调查,对35个城市的教育质量满意度进行了调查。结果表明,教育质量分指数的加权平均值为69。37,介于“可接受”(50)和“良好”(75)之间,西部城市表现优于东部城市。报告还使用了子指数的客观指标,即教育支出占地方财政支出的比例(“支出/GDP”)、中小学教师人数(“教师”)、公共图书馆藏书总量(“图书馆藏书量”)。ks),年终注册人口(“人口”)和在职员工平均收入(“收入”)-作为解释变量,教育质量满意度子指数作为解释变量。通过回归分析,可以得出结论,“收入”和“消费GDP”对解释变量的影响最为显著,这些方面的改善可以通过增加“书籍库存”来实现,为学生的思维提供更好的营养。改善学校的基础设施和管理,为教师提供更好的培训。为了提高居民对教育质量的满意度,学校和政府共同努力为学生提供更好的教育环境也是非常重要的。
To raise the satisfaction with education quality is an indispensable part in the improvement of urban residents’ quality of life and a requirement of the 19th CPC National Congress. This report investigated the satisfaction with education quality in the 35 cities through a questionnaire survey. According to the results,the weighted mean of education quality sub-indices was 69.37-between “acceptable” (50) and “good” (75),with western cities performing better than eastern ones. The report also used objective indicators of the sub-index—the proportion of education expenditure to local fiscal expenditure(“spending/gdp”),the number of teachers in primary/secondary schools (“schoolteachers”),the total stock of books in public libraries (“stock of books”),year-end registered population (“population”) and the average income of in-service staff (“income”) - as the explanatory variables,and the satisfaction sub-index of education quality as the explained variable. Through regression analysis,it can be concluded that,“income” and “spendinggdp” are of the most significant effects on the explained variable,and that improvements in these aspects can be achieved by increasing “stock of books” to provide better nourishment for students’ mind,upgrading the infrastructure and the management of schools and providing better training to teachers. To improve resident’ satisfaction with education quality,it is also very important for schools and the government to work together to provide a better educational environment for the students.
<<