对公共利益的保护是著作权法的重要内容,也是贯穿于整个著作权法律体系的理论精髓。我国宪法、民法、行政法等法律规范都对公共利益的保护做出相应规定,禁止权利人行使权利时对公共利益造成损害,以此界定公民权利与公共利益的边界。但权利人并无放弃或减少自己合法权益让公益受益的法定义务,法律更不能强制性地剥夺公民的权益来满足公共利益的需求,即使在维护公共利益时,也不能对公民的基本权利和自由进行限制,这是现代法治精神的基本理念,国外很多宪法对此做出相应的回应。我国著作权法中的权利限制制度对著作权人的限制过于宽泛、内容不合理,呈现极强的公权色彩,理论背后的不公平性日益凸显。国家既然是公益的天然代表者,其理应是公益责任的天然承担者,国家不能通过对公民个人权利的剥夺和自由的限制转移责任。因此,著作权法的立法理念需要重新审视,公共利益补偿机制急需建立,以彰显现代私法保护精神。
<<The protection of public interest is an important part of the copyright law,and it is also the essence of the theory of the entire copyright legal system. China's constitution,civil law,administrative law and other legal norms all make provisions on the protection of public interests,prohibiting the exercise of rights holders to damage the public interest,thereby defining the boundary between civil rights and the public interest. However,the right holder has no statutory obligation to abandon or reduce his or her legitimate rights and interests to benefit the public interest. The law cannot forcibly deprive citizens of their rights and interests to meet the needs of the public interest. Even in the protection of the public interest,the basic rights of citizens cannot be Freedom to impose restrictions is the basic concept of the modern rule of law,and many foreign constitutions respond accordingly.The restriction system of rights in China's copyright law restricts the copyright owner too broadly,the content is unreasonable,and it shows a strong public power color. The unfairness behind the theory is increasingly prominent. Since the country is a natural representative of public welfare,it should be the natural bearer of public welfare responsibility. The state cannot transfer responsibility by depriving and restricting the individual rights of citizens. Therefore,the legislative concept of the Copyright Law needs to be re-examined,and the public interest compensation mechanism needs to be established urgently to demonstrate the spirit of modern private law protection.
<<