住房是人民安居、经济发展的载体和体现,而地震往往让住房受到不同程度的影响。为支持抗震救灾、推动灾民安置和引导恢复重建,住房评估成为震后阶段的重要工作。“5·12”地震和“9·21”地震是我国近年来震级最高的两次地震。本文以这两次地震的重灾区,即都江堰和南投为例,结合文献归纳和对两者的比较研究来总结其在评估流程、框架和作用等方面的策略与特征。文章得出,两者在整体策略上基本一致,但在实际策略的组织部署和技术利用上有所差别。本研究总结了两者的经验和不足,为震后住房应急管理中的住房评估提出思路和建议。
<<Housings,as carriers and embodiments of residential accommodation and economic development,the occurrences of earthquakes often affect housing in various degrees. In order to support earthquake relief,promote the resettlement of victims and guide the restoration and reconstruction,housings evaluation have become a crucial task in the period of post-earthquake. As the two earthquakes with the highest Richter scale in recent years in China,both of May. 12 earthquake and Sept. 21 earthquake caused the massive earthquake-affected housings,what put the housings evaluation into a crucial position in post-earthquake phases. This study takes Dujiangyan City and Nantou County,the severely-disaster area in these two disasters,as examples,combines the literature induction and a comparative study of the two to summarize their tactics and characteristics in the assessment procedure,framework and meaning. The paper concludes that,although the two are basically the same in the overall strategy,there are differences in actual strategy of organizational deployment and technology utilization. This study summarizes the experience and deficiencies of the two cases and proposes ideas and suggestions for housing evaluation in post-disaster housing emergency management.
<<