更多>>
课题组动态
更多>>
皮书作者
热点推荐：
双循环
本文通过收集整理大量数据，对国医大师的年度数据进行了分析，对比了三届共90位国医大师的年龄、学术作品、临床科研成果、学科分布和网络学术影响，并对国医大师发表论文的h指数、g指数、点击量和被引量进行了排名，发现国医大师的网络学术影响力存在着明显差异。同时，本文还对目前国医大师的评选机制进行了调查和分析，发现目前国医大师的评选基本是按地区名额分配而忽略了他们的学术影响力和网络影响力。
<<By collecting and sorting out a large amount of data，this paper analyses the annual data of Chinese medical masters，compares the age，academic works，clinical scientific research achievements，subject distribution and academic impact of network of 90 Chinese medical masters in three years，and ranks the H index，g index，click-through volume and cited amount of Chinese medical masters，and finds that the network academic influence of Chinese medical masters is obvious. Differences. At the same time，this paper also investigates and analyses the current selection mechanism of Chinese medical masters，and finds that the current selection of Chinese medical masters is basically based on the allocation of regional quotas，ignoring their academic and network influence.
<<
