As an important part of the modernization of national governance system and capacity，the high-quality development of social organizations has great significance to the new era of “building a social governance pattern of co-construction，co-governance and sharing”. After more than ten years of gradual and debugging development，the standardized，orderly，socialized and professional evaluation process of social organization evaluation has established and continuously improved. This report takes the 2017 national social organization evaluation as the research object，and uses process tracking and descriptive statistical methods to systematically analyze the evaluation work and the evaluation results. First，in 2017，the national social organization evaluation cycle was nearly 10 months，and the routine work was further refined，which covers improving the evaluation criteria，strengthening the cultivation of third-party institutions，strictly assessing discipline，and strengthening dynamic management. Second，many innovated works were carried out in this year，including further innovation of social evaluation surveys，innovation of party building mobilization models，innovative information disclosure methods，improvement of evaluation criteria and third -party assessment methods and so on. Third，the results of social organization evaluation scords show that the evaluation process and evaluation requirements are more rigorous，and the trend of evaluating the dynamic management of evaluation rating results is more obvious. Finally，the analysis of the evaluation indicators shows that the main advantages of participating in national social organizations are going to higher standardization of basic conditions，stronger professionalization of personnel management，and more remarkable achievements in public welfare and publicity. The main problems in participating in national social organizations are insufficient institutional construction and lack of effective fund management. However，risk prevention awareness is not strong and social recognition in crisis management needs to be further improved generally.