In the assessment of 2018，the indicator one “fully perform government functions according to law” consists of “institutional settings”，“number of leadership positions”，“public service”，“public safety”，“ecological” five secondary indicators and divided into seven concrete observation points，observation point on the new “reduce administrative proof materials” and “environment protection”，so that we can assess these city more precise. At the same time，the evaluation process more emphasis on the government to perform the functions of quality inspection. From the perspective of various indicators，the performance of institutional reform and leadership compilation optimization is relatively unchanged from previous years. This is because the institutional reform has not been launched in 2017，so the changes at the local government level are not significant. In terms of public services，although the scores have declined，the internal quality of public services has improved significantly. It can be felt that local governments are in a metamorphosis period in terms of public services，and at the same time，they are faced with a hardtime，that is，they have generally been able to provide better basic public services，but they are still in the process of exploring how to continue to optimize the content of services and innovate the way of services. There is a big gap between cities in cleaning up the newly added “reduce administrative proof materials”，which is related to some cities taking the lead in optimizing services and achieving better results. The scores of “major safety accidents” and “ecological environment protection” are relatively good. However，from the perspective of individual cases，some evaluated cities still have insufficient risk prevention awareness and insufficient eco-environmental protection awareness.