互联网的发展,催生了网络直播、定时播放这样的“非交互式”网络传播行为。对非交互式网络传播行为的定性,在司法界和理论界都产生了意见分歧,主要有以下三种,或判定其侵犯信息网络传播权,或判定其侵犯广播权,或判定其侵犯“应当由著作权人享有的其他权利”。本文在剖析“非交互式”网络传播行为能否适用信息网络传播权、广播权和“兜底条款”的基础上,提出两种解决“非交互式”网络传播司法判决分歧的较好方式。一是拓展广播权;二是把广播权和信息网络传播权合并,建立“向公众传播权”。
<<With the development of network technology, Non-interactive Network Communication such as live broadcast and regular play have been appeared, but the nature of Non-interactive Network Communication have resulted in disagreement between the judicial and theoretical circles. There are three types of judgements, or determine that they infringe on the Right of Information Network Communication, or determine its infringement of Broadcasting Rights, or determine its infringement “Other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner”. Based on the analysis of Non-interactive Network Communication, whether it can be applied to the Right of Information Network Communication and Broadcasting Rights or “save clause” is still a problem. Finally I think it is a better way to solve the non-interactive network communication to expand Broadcasting Right, or merge Broadcasting Right and the Right of Information Network Communication and establish “the Right of Communication to the Public”.
<<Keywords: | “Non-interactive” Network CommunicationThe Right of Information Network CommunicationBroadcasting RightsThe Right To Communicate To the Public |